The Ugly Truth About Jesus

Gen. James Green

I SRAEL’S GOLDA MEIR, who was born in Russia and brought up in Milwaukee, claimed Palestine as a homeland. This is a reminder that statements and claims can be very misleading. The whole “Jew” issue is one of fiction, not fact. It is time to SOBER UP!

More and more people of the world are waking up to the deception of the Zionist movement: political and religious. For too long, most Christians blithely ignored or blindly went along with Jewish/Zionist fables about “Jews” being the “Chosen people of God” FOREVER, NO MATTER WHAT! I have been guilty also [in the past]. But I have done my homework since then on this “Jew” issue, as I have with Islam.

Racial Or Spiritual?

SIMPLY STATED: “GRACE NOT RACE.” Jesus saw to this. Jesus was to break down the middle wall of partition (Eph. 2:14). He introduced “grace,” and abolished “race,” i.e., racial Jews could now be saved, not by works of the Law, but by faith and grace, “that He might reconcile both unto God in one body by the Cross…” (v. 15). The “Jew” and the “Gentile” could, by repentance/forgiveness, become ONE BODY in Christ. “For by grace (not race) are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves; it is the gift of God: not or works, lest any man should boast” (Eph. 2:8, 9).

By Jesus’ death and resurrection, both Jew/Gentile could enter together into the Kingdom of God. Literal Israel could become part of Spiritual Israel; Paul rightly wrote: “There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond or free, there is neither male or female: for ye are all ONE in Christ Jesus” (Gal. 3:28). Jesus, the Jewish Messiah, removed ALL ethnic, racial, national, social and sexual distinctions—ALL—by repentance and forgiveness can be equal heirs in Christ. But the Jews reject this. They prefer race, not grace. Nevertheless, the spiritual is the true Jew now.

Jeremiah 31:31-34

“BEHOLD, the days are coming, says the Lord, when I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel and with the house of Judah, [Luke 22:20; I Cor. 11:25.] Not according to the covenant which I made with their fathers in the day when I took them by the hand to bring them out of the land of Egypt, My covenant which they broke, although I was their Husband, says the Lord. But this is the covenant which I will make with the house of Israel: After those days, says the Lord, I will put My law within them, and on their hearts will I write it; and I will be their God, and they will be My people. And they will no more teach each man his neighbor and each man his brother, saying, Know the Lord, for they will all know Me [recognize, understand, and be acquainted with Me], from the least of them to the greatest, says the Lord. For I will forgive their iniquity, and I will [seriously] remember their sin no more [Heb. 8:8-12; 10:16, 17].”

This was foretold centuries ago. Why do the “Jews” not know this? Jeremiah wrote about true (spiritual) Israel—the believers in Jesus the Christ/Messiah, in ALL ages, and not just “Jews.” “Salvation is of the Jews.” This does not mean that Judaism had/has salvation, Christ meant that salvation came THROUGH the nation of Israel BECAUSE OF CHRIST Himself being of Hebrew descent. The Old Testament (Jewish/Hebrew) was merely a shadow of better things to come; Spirit birth (Jn. 3) became the substance—the “real thing!”


THE “JEWS’” promised land is in reality a socialist state; no freedom of religion. Christians are terrorized along with the Palestinians.

To my point: The people who run and control Israel are NOT physical descendants of Abraham (who was not even “Jewish”). Please allow me to present a few facts:

1. The Jews in the world today are comprised of two large groups known as the Sephardim and the Ashkenazim.

2. The Sephardic Jews are descended from the Palestinian Jews of the first and earlier centuries who settled in various Mediterranean countries from which they spread into the nations of Western Europe. Sepharad was their name for Spain in which there was a large settlement of Jews even in pre-Christian times.

3. The Ashkenazim are descended from the Kazars or Chazars who established a strong kingdom in what is now Southern Russia from which they spread into the nations of Eastern Europe. The Kazars adopted Judaism as a national religion in about the eighth or ninth century and thus became proselyte Jews.

4. A well-known Jewish author, Arthur Koestler, in his book, “The Thirteenth Tribe,” stated that in the I960's, only about 500,000 Sephardim lived in the world, while there were about 11,000,000 Ashkenazim.

5. Koestler further stated that the Kazars trace their ancestry back to Japheth, and not to Shem. Therefore they acknowledge that they are neither Semitic nor the descendants of Abraham.

6. Zionist political leaders today have not only been content to allow, but to foster the misconceptions concerning their origins in the minds of Gentiles, particularly Christians who have a high regard for the Biblical accounts of a special relationship between the children of Abraham and the land of Palestine.

7. The two leading parties of the Zionist state of Israel today, The Labor Party, and the Likud Party, are both largely Ashkenazim in their make-up. The Sephardim in their midst have little representation in government and have considerable difficulty in finding jobs and housing.

8. The nation of Israel today is a secular state and considers the religious Jews, largely the Sephardim, as a problem. The majority of the Ashkenazim regard themselves as atheists.

9. The Ashkenazim, not being of Abraham nor even Semitic, have no more historical claim to the land of Palestine than the Eskimos or Hottentots.

10. The Sephardim are the only Jews who may have some justifiable claim to Palestine as their ancient homeland. However, a careful consideration of this claim reveals some problems.

11. Abraham was not a Jew. If he were, then all his descendants would also be Jews, including the Arabs who claim descent from Abraham through his son Ishmael.

12. Neither were Isaac, Jacob, the twelve sons of Jacob, Moses, nor David, ever called Jews in the Bible.

13. After the death of King Solomon, the people of Israel became divided into two nations which were the Kingdom of Israel in the north and the Kingdom of Judah in the south.

14. The Kingdom of Israel was nominally made up of ten tribes, and never had a king of the line of David.

15. The Kingdom of Judah was made up of the tribes of Judah, Benjamin, and Levi. This kingdom always had a king of the line of David until the time of the Babylonian captivity.

16. The word “Jew” is a diminutive of the name “Judah.” It is not used in the Bible in reference to the man Judah, nor even to the tribe of Judah. It always refers to the Kingdom of Judah, and means a remnant or a fragment of Judah. It is used in the Bible the very first time in II Kings 16:6, and here in the latter sense.

17. The people of the northern Kingdom of Israel occupied what is now called Samaria, Galilee, the Golan Heights, and the northern coastline up to Tyre. These people are never called Jews in the Bible. The ancestors of today’s Jews never lived in these lands.

18. The southern coastline of Palestine, including Gaza, was inhabited in Old Testament times by the Philistines, and the people of Judah or Israel never lived there.

19. The northern Kingdom of Israel was conquered by the Assyrians in the second half of the eighth century B.C. The people were deported to regions of Media by the Assyrians.20. The Assyrians brought in people from five small nations to inhabit the conquered lands of Israel, and the resultant mixture of these people became known as the Samaritans. They were not of Abraham.

21. 130 years after the Assyrian captivity of Israel, the Kingdom of Judah was conquered by Babylon. The people of Judah were carried captive to the city of Babylon, and this captivity is known as the Exile.

22. There is no known mixture of the people of Israel and the people of Judah during their captivities. These captivities occurred in different centuries, they were brought about by different foreign powers, and the two peoples were sent to different geographical regions. While still in Palestine, these two peoples were not the best of friends, anyway.

23. In the fifth century B.C., a remnant of Judah, Benjamin, and Levi returned to Jerusalem to rebuild the temple under the leadership of Ezra and Nehemiah. They established the Nation of the Jews which endured until AD 70. These people were well-known as Jews, and their history is related by Josephus.

24. The Jews of the first century had no dealings with the Samaritans and certainly never lived in Samaria.

25. The Sephardic Jews of today have no historical claim whatsoever to the West Bank lands of Samaria, the Golan Heights, the northern coastline, etc., since no ancestor of the Sephardim ever lived there.

26. These misconceptions and false premises became so entrenched in our thinking, our culture, and our Christian traditions that we have been misled into error regarding these matters. To the extent that American foreign policy is based upon such false assumptions, to that extent we are headed for disastrous consequences since truth has a way of eventually catching up with us.

27. Since the Ashkenazim who control Israel today are neither Abrahamic, nor even Semitic, they have become the most vicious Anti-Semitic group in the world in their merciless treatment of the Semitic Arabs in Palestine, both Arab and Christian. Are Zionists practicing Genocide?


The Holy Bible

Flavius Josephus

The Jewish Encyclopedia

Arthur Koestler

Alfred Lilienthal

Benjamin Freedman (End Quote)

In light of this, most will go on supporting these “Jews.” Not all “Jews” are vicious, just like not all Muslims are vicious. One needs to know that Trump’s daughter and Son-in-law are Lubavitch Jews (she is a convert).

Rabbi Schneur Zalman, founder of Chabad-Lubavitch, regards Christians and Gentiles as “supernal refuse,” i.e., GARBAGE!

The founder of Lubavitcher Hasidism taught that there is a difference of essence between the souls of Jews and the souls of Gentiles—the Jewish soul has a spark of divine vitality; not so in the Gentile, they are spiritually and biologically inferior (see “The New Republic” [Judaic mag.], May, 1992).

Gentile souls are…totally evil, according to Rabbi Zalman (see “Habad: The Hasidism of Schneur Zalman of Lyady,” 1993, pp. 108, 109). There are many quotes from Zalman’s Likutei Amorim Tonya.

[One remark of his that paints the picture colorfully is, “All non-Jews are EVIL by nature. The Jews are the crown of creation, the non-Jews are the scum of the earth.”]

If one digs deep into Judaism’s writings/teachings, one will discover that the nations of the world are [supposedly] NOT human (see the Kabbalistic Zohar for real shocks!).

THE HATEFUL TALMUD REGARDS CHRISTIANITY AS “IDOL WORSHIP,” I.E., WE WORSHIP JESUS. Like I’ve said beforehand, there are opposing texts in the Talmud, they can and will be used against us if we’re not familiar with their writings.

The Muslims use the same tactics. When they want good favor from the Gentiles/Christians, they cite the “peaceful” surahs; when they want to incite hatred, they cite “terror” surahs. ISIS cites the “terror” chapters/verses when they want to instill fear in their victims.

BT Avodah Zarah 17a says that: Christians are allied with Hell, and it is worse than incest. In that same text, it states that going to prostitutes is the same as becoming a Christian. In BT Sanhedrin 90a it says that those who read the (New Testament) Gospels are doomed to Hell! BT Sanhedrin 99a says when the Messiah comes, he will destroy the Christians. In BT Rosh Hashanah 17a, it says those who read the New Testament will have no portion in the world to come. BT Shabbat 116a says that the New Testament must be destroyed—burned. Not only do Muslims burn the New Testaments, but “Jews” do also.

Blessed Mary?

...NOT ACCORDING to BT Sanhedrin 106a: “She who was the descendant of princes and governors played the harlot (whore) with carpenters.” In footnote (#2) to Shabbath 104b of the Soncino edition—in the uncensored text of the Talmud, it says that Jesus’ mother, “Miriam the hairdresser,” had sex with many men. Two notable English Translations of the latter (Talmud) are the Soncino and the incomplete (as of 2011) Steinsaltz.

BT Sanhedrin (S) 107b states that Jesus was an idolater and worked magic (vol. 21). The BT records many “sins” that Jesus did—He and His disciples practiced sorcery/black magic, were sponsored by foreign Gentile powers in order to subvert Israel BTS 43a); Jesus was sexually immoral and refused to repent (BTS 107b, Sotah 47a); Jesus learned witchcraft in Egypt (BT Shabbos 104b). These are a few indictments we find coming from Chabad-Lubavitch on their website.

The Talmud goes on to say that Jesus is in Hell being boiled in feces (BT Gittin 57a). BTS 43a states that Jesus was hanged because He incited idolatry.

Deceived And Being Deceived

JOHANN MAIER (Cologne Univ.) wrote, “Jesus of Nazareth in Talmud Tradition,” a book trying to prove that Jesus is not mentioned in the Talmud. But other scholars of the Talmud disagree, saying he is deceived and deceives others. Maier claims that the Talmud is unreliable concerning true/actual historical sources. Well, he is right about that: what we read about Jesus is altogether FALSE! But in order to keep “Christophobia” on the burner—sick and hateful fantasies about Jesus, the “Jews” can’t bear to think that they MURDERED their long-awaited Messiah.

One thing that the BT does do, “it constitutes valid testimony of the Antichrist HATE propaganda that Judaism erected over time as a reply to the challenge of the Gospel,” writes Dr. Hoffman (ibid, p. 246). No matter how hard the “Jews” try to belittle our Savior, it is actually counterproductive. Their hateful counter-narratives only prove that Jesus was just the opposite of what they say and write.

Siding With Anti-Christ

HEY, “CHRISTIANS,” when you cuddle up to Judaism, you cuddle up to Satan! He is the father of LIES. This Anti-Christ religion contests fervently the claim that Jesus was not/is not the Messiah, but the Gospels confirm that He was/is the Son of God.

As far as their “guilt” of murdering Jesus goes, they maintain, and accept responsibility for it, BUT, they say, there is no reason to feel guilty because they rightfully EXECUTED an idolater/blasphemer.

They refuse to believe in Jesus’ resurrection: “He is in Hell” they exclaim loudly!

David Klinghoffer writes in, “What the Talmud Really Says About Jesus” (Publishers Weekly, Jan. 31, 2007), “…the scandalous passages indeed refer not to some other figure of ancient times but to the famous Jesus of Nazareth. What exactly is so scandalous? How about Jesus punished in Hell for eternity by being made to sit in a cauldron of boiling excrement? That image appears in early MSS of the BT, as does a brief account of Jesus’ trial and execution—not by the Romans, but by the Jewish high court, the Sanhedrin. The Jewish community…has been content to let them remain obscure and unknown…it seems fair to say now that the Talmud is every bit as offensive to Christians as the Gospels are to Jews. The Talmud’s scattered portrait of Jesus unapologetically mocks Christian doctrines including the virgin birth and the resurrection.”

Is what Klinghoffer wrote true? Yes and no. He is right about all those derogatory statements in the BT; he is wrong that the “Jews” have let them remain obscure and unknown. AS I WRITE, THE ZIONIST/RABBINIC COMMUNITY ACTIVELY TEACHES / PREACHES ABOUT THIS. The “Jews” hate Christianity because it was founded by an idolater / blasphemer / liar / deceiver / magic-worker / fornicator / adulterer etc.

Judaism has always accepted those repugnant/disgraceful libels and malice in the Talmud—those perverted pawn scurrilities / obscenities directed against Christianity and Christians.

In Israel, these Orthodox “Jews” hurl obscenities/scurrilous abuses at both Arabs and Christians. Yet, the Church believes that these “Jews” are “the apple of God’s eye.”

David Klinghoffer writes... “it seems fair to say now that the Talmud is every bit as offensive to Christians as the Gospels are to Jews.”

    ✡ Believing Their Own Lies

OVER THE YEARS, many “Jews” deny what the Talmud says, claiming that those hateful statements were spur-of-the-moment statements…like blowing off steam! Really? Modern defenders of Judaism protest that it is the Christians, not “Jews,” that keep this controversy going.

Feb. 20, 2003, the Anti-Defamation League of B’nai Birth wrote, “To agitate Christian readers, anti-Talmud writers often attempt to portray the Talmud as demeaning the figure of Jesus” (p. 11 of “The Talmud in Anti-Semitic Polemics”). It is OK for “Jews” to hurl DEFAMATION statements against Christians/Christianity, but they have BIG BRO to STOP defamation from any and all who see thru their religious con-games. We have the right to point out HATE CRIMES by the “Jews.” And just what does the ADL mean by “demeaning”? HA! The Talmud is transmogrifying. WE ARE CALLED “AGITATORS” IF WE REMIND THESE “JEWS” OF WHAT THEY SAY ABOUT THE FOUNDER OF CHRISTIANITY. They act like exposure of the Talmud is a BIG conspiracy theory. The bully ADL lashes out in rage and fury in order to terrorize/intimidate any and all who DARE to quote the Talmud.

The ADL and others (like the Southern Poverty Law) are good at Christian-bashing and career-killing. We are hated by both. Good! The ADL (ibid) writes that “the Talmud has only a few references of Jesus that may not reflect the courteous ecumenicism of the modern world, neither are they particularly inflammatory.” Hmmmm! I’ll tell you what, say the same things about “Jews,” and see if the ADL does not RAISE HELL against you! The ADL is a group of BIG CRY BABIES!!!

Check This Out!

DR. MICHAEL HOFFMAN comments in his book (ibid, pp. 249, 250) on the disputed name “Balaam,” which some claim is a code name for “Jesus:”



Let us return to the ADL’s story line: “But the Talmud bears much harsher animus towards the biblical figure of Balaam, the pagan magician who sought to curse the Jews as they traveled through the desert after the Exodus from Egypt. Rabbinic tradition ascribes other crimes to Balaam as well, and in various places describes some of the punishments he may have suffered after his death. In the nineteenth century, when the field of academic Jewish studies was in its infancy, a small group of Jewish scholars suggested that in some cases the term Balaam in the Talmud may be a code word for Jesus. Though later scholars showed that this suggestion [supposedly] could not be true (for reasons pertaining to the context of the Balaam references and the lack of manuscript variants substituting Jesus for Balaam), anti-Semites have ever since claimed that the true hatred that Judaism possesses for Christianity is expressed in these coded expressions against Balaam found in the Talmud”

 ( also:

According to the all-knowing “gedolim” of the ADL, aside from a handful of wayward “Jewish scholars” it is mainly dastardly “anti-Semites” who assert that in the Talmud, Balaam is a code-word for Jesus. If the ADL will pardon our inexcusable impudence in seeking to think for ourselves, let us parse the texts of the Babylonian Talmud to determine the truth. BT Berakoth 17b: “There is no breach, that is: may our company not be like that of David from which issued Ahitophel (who made a breach in the kingdom of David)...may our company not be like that of Saul from which issued Doeg the Edomite (who went forth to evil ways). And no outcry: may our company not be like that of Elisha, from which issued Gehazi (who became a leper and thus cried out, ‘Unclean, unclean!’). In our broad places: may we produce no son or pupil who disgraces himself in public like Jesus of Nazareth.”

The words “like Jesus of Nazareth” appear in the original Talmud and in Babylonian Talmud manuscripts Oxford Opp. Add. 23 (366) and Paris Heb. 671. But in the Talmud manuscripts known as Munich 95 and Firenze II.1.7, following the phrase “in public” the name Jesus of Nazareth has been removed. Prof. Schafer states (p. 154), “In the Soncino and Vilna printed editions, the text has been tampered with by the censor.”

The Mishnah at Sanhedrin 10:2 declares, “Four ordinary people have no portion in the world to come...Balaam, Doeg, Ahitophel and Gehazi.” But, nota bene, in Berakoth 17b, the Gemara (not “anti-Semites”) puts Jesus in the place of Balaam to indicate that Jesus is another Balaam!

Who was Balaam? He is the one who seduced Israel into the sexually-oriented idolatry of Baal-Peor. Consequently, the passage in BT Berakoth 17b is more than just an attack on Jesus as damned to perdition along with Doeg, Ahitophel and Gehazi. Orthodox rabbis and scholars would be conversant with the original damnation formula of the Mishnah in Sanhedrin 10:2: “Balaam, Doeg, Ahitophel and Gehazi” and would be aware that the formula in Berakoth 17b: “Ahitophel, Doeg, Gehazi and Jesus of Nazareth” reflected the fact that Jesus had been chosen to represent Balaam as symbolic of one of the supremely EVIL four personages DAMNED by the early Pharisaic oral tradition. (End of Quote).

[Note: Also consider BT chapter 5, Aboth 13: “(p. 132) MISHNA AA. In whomsoever are the following three things, he is a disciple of Abraham, and in whomsoever are the contrary three things, he is a disciple of Balaam.” Here we see it logical to replace “Balaam” with “Jesus.” Enemy #1 of the Jews IS Jesus Christ of Nazareth. Page 133 goes on to say: “MISHNA BB. He who possesses a good eye, a modest spirit, and a humble mind is to be counted the disciple of Abraham our father; an evil eye, a haughty spirit, and a bombastic mind is to be counted the DISCIPLE OF BALAAM. And what difference is there between the disciples of Abraham and those of Balaam? The disciples of Balaam go down to Gehenna, as it is written [Ps. lv. 24]: “But thou, O God, thou wilt bring them down into the pit of destruction: let not the men of blood and deceit live out half their days; but I will indeed trust in thee.” But the disciples of Abraham derive benefit in this world and inherit the world to come…” (End BT Mishna Quote). It is logical here also to determine that this passage is referring to Jesus Christ. Who has expounded on the disciples of Balaam? It would lead us to the conclusion that Balaam=Christ, and Balaam’s Disciples=Christians, MTW.]

So, the ADL hatemongers are the ones who incite “Christophobia” by what they say and do among themselves—they keep the HATE aflame!

Anytime a Christian pinpoints their hate crimes, they kick into the “persecuted” mode—the “victim” mode. BIG CRY BABIES! BY MEANS OF THEIR ACCUSATIONS ABOUT “AGITATION,” THEY AUTOMATICALLY INCITE HATRED FOR CHRISTIANITY FROM THEIR RANKS.

These liars/deceivers emanate hatred for truth. They love to play the role of “morality police,” beating any and all into submission with their “Anti-Semitic” club. But what about their Anti-Christianity inflammatory character within Orthodox Judaism? Are they not guilty of relentless ritual cursing/blasphemy of the Name of Jesus Christ the Lord? Yes! Their ranks are filled up with foaming-at-the-mouth Judaics who would crucify Jesus all over again if He were here today. Their loud and incessant rants against THEIR crucified, resurrected, and glorified Savior have not died down.

WITH ALL THIS SAID, DON’T YOU THINK THE “JEWS” NEED OUR PRAYERS? Who will pray for their conversion if the Universal Ekklesia doesn’t?

   Gal 3:29: